DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
v.
CHARLES T. MERRELL, SR., AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARY OF CHARLES THOMAS MERRELL, II, DECEASED, AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES THOMAS MERRELL, II AND JANE CEVERNY, AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARY OF CHARLES THOMAS MERRELL II, DECEASED
Closed
Opinions Issued

Percuriam
Per Curiam
Per Curiam Opinion (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry about 1 year ago
Docket Sheet
2010-11-12 Case stored in record room –
2010-09-07 Mandate issued –
2010-06-18 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2010-06-18 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2010-06-18 Petition for Review granted under TRAP 59.1 –
2010-06-18 Petition for Review disposed – View Sheet
2010-01-26 Reply brief – Petitioner
2010-01-11 Brief filed. – Respondent
2009-12-10 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet
2009-12-09 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2009-11-20 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2009-10-09 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-10-08 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-09-15 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-09-14 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-09-01 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2009-09-01 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2009-08-27 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2009-08-25 Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2009-08-21 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-07-28 reply filed – Petitioner
2009-07-13 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2009-06-11 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-05-27 Designation of Lead Counsel for (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-05-26 Case forwarded to Court –
2009-05-21 Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2009-05-08 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2009-05-08 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2009-04-13 second m/e/t to file pet/review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-04-13 Call received – Respondent
2009-04-09 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Respondent
2009-04-08 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Respondent
2009-04-07 second m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
2009-03-20 m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-03-19 m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., petitioner see attorneys

Merrell, Sr., Charles T., respondent see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney
Texas Supreme Court Order Lists

Order List of 2010-06-18
Courts Below
Court of Appeals:
Texarkana (6th COA)
No. 06-07-00122-CV docket
by Honorable Jack Carter

Trial Court:
Fannin County
Honorable Jim D. Lovett