2011-10-05	Oral argument –
2011-10-04	Motion to Argue disposed – Respondent View Sheet
2011-10-03	Motion to Argue filed – Respondent
2011-10-03	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Amicus Curiae
2011-10-03	Call received – Amicus Curiae
2011-10-03	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Respondent
2011-09-30	Response to Motion – Petitioner
2011-09-30	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2011-09-30	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Respondent
2011-09-06	Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2011-09-06	Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2011-07-22	Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2011-04-01	Petition for Review granted –
2011-04-01	Petition for Review disposed – OA date & time not set. View Sheet
2011-01-27	Waiver notice for brief on the merits – Respondent
2011-01-03	Brief filed. – Petitioner
2010-12-15	Case Record Filed – Court of Appeals
2010-12-10	Record Requested in Petition for Review – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2010-12-07	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Amicus Curiae
2010-12-06	Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2010-12-03	briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-10-12	Response to Petition for Review filed – Respondent
2010-09-07	Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-08-10	Case forwarded to Court –
2010-08-05	Response to Petition for Review waived – Respondent
2010-07-07	Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2010-07-07	Petition for Review filed – Petitioner

Wasserman, M.D., Mr. Matthew W., petitioner see attorneys

Gugel, Ms. Christina Bergeron, respondent see attorneys

Texas Assoc. Against Sexual Assault and Texas Advocacy Project, amicus curiae see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney