DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
ETAN INDUSTRIES, INC. AND ETAN INDUSTRIES, INC., D/B/A CMA CABLEVISION AND/OR CMA COMMUNICATIONS
v.
RONALD LEHMANN AND DANA LEHMANN
Decided for about 1 month
Opinions Issued

Percuriam Per Curiam Opinion (PDF)
Recent Events
    3 days ago: M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed View Sheet
    8 days ago: Response to Motion
Docket Sheet
2012-02-06 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed – Petitioner View Sheet
2012-02-01 Response to Motion – Respondent
2012-01-31 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2012-01-31 M/E/T to file motion for rehearing – Respondent
2012-01-09 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed – Petitioner View Sheet
2012-01-06 Notice requesting filing fee – Respondent
2012-01-05 M/E/T to file motion for rehearing – Respondent
2011-12-16 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2011-12-16 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2011-12-16 Petition for Review granted under TRAP 59.1 –
2011-12-16 Petition for Review disposed – View Sheet
2011-07-27 Document filed (see remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2011-07-26 Document filed (see remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2011-05-27 Reply brief – Petitioner
2011-05-11 Brief filed. – Respondent
2011-05-11 Appendix Filed – Respondent
2011-04-12 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet
2011-04-08 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2011-03-07 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet
2011-03-03 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2011-02-16 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2011-02-10 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner View Sheet
2011-02-07 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2010-12-29 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2010-12-29 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner View Sheet
2010-12-27 certification (various) in case received – Petitioner
2010-12-21 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2010-12-20 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2010-12-10 Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2010-12-10 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-10-25 Referral to Pro Bono Program - Letter sent to All Counsel of Record and Program Liason –
2010-08-30 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2010-08-25 Response to Petition for Review filed – Respondent
2010-08-03 Call received – Petitioner
2010-07-29 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-07-13 Case forwarded to Court –
2010-06-09 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2010-06-09 Petition for Review filed – Petitioner
2010-05-11 M/E/T to file petition for review disposed – Petitioner View Sheet
2010-05-11 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Respondent
2010-05-07 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Respondent
2010-05-06 M/E/T to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
Nathan Industries, Inc., petitioner see attorneys

Lehmann, Mr. Ronald, respondent see attorneys

Lehmann, Mrs. Dana, respondent see attorneys

Texas Cable Association, amicus curiae see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney