DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY F/K/A THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
Closed

Articles Mentioning This Case

Four opinons, three grants (including appellate attorneys fees and home-equity lending) [Feb. 25, 2011] SCOTXblog (February 27, 2011)
Opinions Issued

Percuriam Per Curiam Opinion (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry 7 months ago
Docket Sheet
2011-07-18 Case stored in record room –
2011-04-13 Record returned to Court of Appeals –
2011-04-13 Mandate issued –
2011-02-25 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2011-02-25 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2011-02-25 Petition for Review granted under TRAP 59.1 –
2011-02-25 Petition for Review disposed – View Sheet
2010-09-13 Reply brief – Petitioner
2010-08-27 Brief filed. – Respondent
2010-07-26 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet
2010-07-22 Response to Motion – Petitioner
2010-07-21 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2010-07-20 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2010-06-23 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet
2010-06-17 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2010-06-07 Document received (See Remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2010-06-07 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2010-05-18 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2010-05-10 Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2010-05-06 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-04-20 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2010-04-20 Reply filed – Petitioner
2010-04-06 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Respondent
2010-04-05 Response to Petition for Review filed – Respondent
2010-03-05 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-02-23 Case forwarded to Court –
2010-02-22 Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2010-01-26 Petition for Review filed – Petitioner
2010-01-26 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, respondent see attorneys

The Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railway Co., petitioner see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney