Texas A&M University Kingsville V. Melody Yarbrough, 09-0999

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs

No. 09-0999

go to court website

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY - KINGSVILLE
v.
MELODY YARBROUGH

Closed

UDJA, grievance procedures

Opinions Issued

Majority

Chief Justice Jefferson delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Medina, Justice Green, Justice Guzman, and Justice Lehrmann joined. (PDF)

Dissent

Justice Willett delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Hecht, Justice Wainwright, and Justice Johnson joined. (PDF)

Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry 3 months ago

Docket Sheet

2011-11-02	Case stored in record room –
2011-10-20	Mandate issued –
2011-08-26	Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2011-08-26	Dissenting opinion issued. –
2011-08-26	Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2011-01-28	Post submission brief – Petitioner
2011-01-04	Oral argument –
2011-01-04	Oral argument - –
2010-12-29	Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2010-12-17	Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2010-12-03	Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-12-03	Petition for Review granted –
2010-12-03	Petition for Review disposed – View Sheet
2010-07-13	Reply brief – Petitioner
2010-06-28	Brief filed. – Respondent
2010-06-07	Brief filed. – Petitioner
2010-05-24	Designation of Lead Counsel – Respondent
2010-05-17	Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2010-05-07	Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2010-05-06	briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-04-23	Reply filed – Petitioner
2010-04-09	Response to Petition for Review filed – Respondent
2010-03-08	Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2010-03-05	M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2010-02-24	Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-02-16	Case forwarded to Court –
2010-02-11	Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2010-01-19	Electronic copies of brief posted to website – Petitioner
2010-01-19	Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2010-01-19	Petition for Review filed – Petitioner
2010-01-06	Second m/e/t to file petition for review disposed – Petitioner View Sheet
2010-01-05	Designation of Lead Counsel – Petitioner
2010-01-05	Second m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
2009-12-04	M/E/T to file petition for review disposed – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-12-03	M/E/T to file petition for review filed – Petitioner