Service Corporation International And Sci Texas Funeral Services, Inc., D/B/A Mont Meta Memorial Park V. Juanita G. Guerra, Julie Ann Ramirez, Gracie Little And Mary Esther Martinez, 09-0941

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs

No. 09-0941

go to court website

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL AND SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., D/B/A MONT META MEMORIAL PARK
v.
JUANITA G. GUERRA, JULIE ANN RAMIREZ, GRACIE LITTLE AND MARY ESTHER MARTINEZ

Closed

punitive damages, exemplary damages

Articles Mentioning This Case

See articles about other cases

State Supreme Court overturns cemetery ruling Brownsville Herald (June 24, 2011)

After Grave Is Moved, Regulations Are Scrutinized New York Times (December 16, 2010)

Six merits decisions (including the Robinson asbestos case); an improvident grant; and three new grants [Oct. 22, 2010] SCOTXblog (October 22, 2010)

Opinions Issued

Majority

Justice Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court. (PDF)

Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry 3 months ago

Docket Sheet

2011-11-02	Case stored in record room –
2011-07-29	Mandate issued –
2011-06-17	Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2011-06-17	Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2011-04-21	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Respondent
2011-04-21	Post submission brief – Respondent
2011-03-25	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2011-03-24	Post submission brief – Petitioner
2010-12-10	Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks. – View Sheet
2010-12-09	Oral argument –
2010-12-07	Motion to Amend Filed – Respondent
2010-10-28	Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2010-10-27	Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2010-10-22	Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-10-22	Petition for Review granted –
2010-10-22	Petition for Review disposed – View Sheet
2010-09-21	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2010-09-17	Reply brief – Petitioner
2010-08-30	Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner's Reply Brief View Sheet
2010-08-27	Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2010-08-12	Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner's Reply Brief View Sheet
2010-08-10	Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2010-07-28	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Respondent
2010-07-27	Brief filed. – Respondent
2010-06-15	Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet
2010-06-11	Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2010-06-11	Brief filed. – Petitioner
2010-06-09	Brief filed. – Petitioner
2010-05-11	Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner View Sheet
2010-05-07	Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2010-04-23	Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2010-04-12	Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2010-04-09	briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-03-23	Reply filed – Petitioner
2010-03-08	Response to Petition for Review filed – Respondent
2010-02-05	Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-01-26	Case forwarded to Court –
2010-01-22	Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2009-12-23	Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2009-12-23	Petition for Review filed – Petitioner
2009-11-13	M/E/T to file petition for review disposed – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-11-12	M/E/T to file petition for review filed – Petitioner