2010-12-31	Case stored in record room –
2010-12-31	Record returned to Court of Appeals –
2010-12-29	Notice sent to Court of Appeals –
2010-12-17	Motion for Rehearing - Disposed – Indicates filing re Petition for Review View Sheet
2010-11-12	Appendix to Brief filed – Respondent
2010-11-12	Response to Motion for Rehearing – Respondent
2010-10-05	Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2010-10-01	M/E/T to file motion for rehearing – Respondent
2010-09-27	Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates motion for rehearing. See Event
2010-09-10	Motion for leave to file Supplemental Motion for Rehearing – Petitioner
2010-09-01	Call received – Petitioner
2010-09-01	Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2010-09-01	Motion for Leave to file supplemental mo-rehearing – Petitioner
2010-09-01	Supplement to motion for rehearing – Petitioner
2010-08-24	Case forwarded to Court –
2010-08-23	Motion for Rehearing - Filed – Rehearing filed - Petition for Review
2010-08-02	M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed – Petitioner View Sheet
2010-07-30	M/E/T to file motion for rehearing – Petitioner
2010-07-29	Call received – Petitioner
2010-07-02	Petition for Review disposed – Indicates filing re Petition for Review View Sheet
2010-03-04	Reply brief – Petitioner
2010-02-17	Appendix to Brief filed – Respondent
2010-02-17	Brief filed. – Respondent
2010-01-15	Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet
2010-01-14	Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2010-01-08	Brief filed. – Petitioner
2009-12-23	Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-12-21	Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-12-18	Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2009-11-24	Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2009-11-20	briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-10-16	reply filed – Petitioner
2009-09-28	Appendix to Brief filed – Respondent
2009-09-28	response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2009-08-27	Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-07-28	Case forwarded to Court –
2009-07-22	Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2009-07-13	Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2009-07-13	PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner

Hadley, M.D., Mr. Arthur, petitioner see attorneys

Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., respondent see attorneys

Emig, Ms. Patty A., person interested in case see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney