DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
Opinions Issued

Percuriam The Court's opinion of June 24, 2011 is withdrawn and the opinion of this date is substituted. The concurring opinion by Justice Willet, the dissenting opinion by Justice Green, and the judgment issued June 24, 2011, remain in place. (PDF)
Wainwright Hecht Medina Johnson Guzman Justice Wainwright delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Hecht, Justice Medina, Justice Johnson, and Justice Guzman joined. (PDF)
Willett Justice Willett delivered an opinion concurring in the judgment. (PDF)
Green Jefferson Lehrmann Justice Green delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Jefferson and Justice Lehrmann joined. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry about 1 month ago
Docket Sheet
2011-12-21 Case stored in record room –
2011-12-16 Mandate issued –
2011-12-16 New majority opinion substituted for prior opinion –
2011-12-16 Previous opinion withdrawn –
2011-12-16 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed – To identify a cause in View Sheet
2011-10-19 Reply to motion for rehearing – Petitioner
2011-10-07 Response to Motion for Rehearing – Petitioner
2011-09-16 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2011-09-15 Motion for Extension of Time filed – Petitioner
2011-09-07 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates motion for rehearing. See Event
2011-08-10 Case forwarded to Court –
2011-08-10 Motion for Rehearing - Filed – Respondent's Motion for Rehearing of Cause filed
2011-07-01 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed – View Sheet
2011-06-30 M/E/T to file motion for rehearing – Respondent
2011-06-24 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2011-06-24 Dissenting opinion issued. –
2011-06-24 Concurring opinion issued. –
2011-06-24 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2010-11-10 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2010-11-09 Post submission brief – Petitioner
2010-10-28 Post submission brief – Respondent
2010-09-16 Oral argument –
2010-08-10 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2010-07-30 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2010-07-16 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-04-16 Notice of vacation dates. – Petitioner
2010-04-09 Petition for Review granted –
2010-04-09 Petition for Review disposed – OA date & time not set. View Sheet
2010-03-09 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2010-03-09 Reply brief – Petitioner
2010-02-19 Brief filed. – Respondent
2010-01-14 Correction of brief filed. See Remarks & Description. – Petitioner View Sheet
2010-01-11 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2009-12-21 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet
2009-12-21 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-12-16 Call received – Petitioner
2009-12-14 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2009-12-11 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2009-12-11 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2009-12-11 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-11-24 Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2009-11-20 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-10-19 reply filed – Petitioner
2009-10-02 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2009-09-03 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-08-11 Case forwarded to Court –
2009-07-17 Address Change – Respondent
2009-07-17 Address Change – Respondent
2009-07-10 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2009-07-10 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
Marsh USA Inc., petitioner see attorneys

Cook, Mr. Rex, respondent see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney