DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
ANGLO-DUTCH PETROLEUM INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND ANGLO-DUTCH (TENGE) L.L.C.
v.
GREENBERG PEDEN, P.C. AND GERARD J. SWONKE
Closed
Opinions Issued

Hecht Jefferson Johnson Willett Guzman Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Johnson, Justice Willett, and Justice Guzman joined. (PDF)
Wainwright Justice Wainwright delivered an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. (PDF)
Lehrmann Medina Green Justice Lehrmann delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Medina and Justice Green joined. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry about 1 month ago
Docket Sheet
2011-12-21 Case stored in record room –
2011-12-16 Mandate issued –
2011-12-16 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed – To identify a cause in View Sheet
2011-11-18 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2011-09-27 Case forwarded to Court –
2011-09-27 Case forwarded to Court –
2011-09-27 Motion for Rehearing - Filed – Respondent's Motion for Rehearing of Cause filed
2011-09-09 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed – View Sheet
2011-09-07 M/E/T to file motion for rehearing – Respondent
2011-08-26 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2011-08-26 Dissenting opinion issued. –
2011-08-26 Concurring and dissenting opinion delivered –
2011-08-26 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2011-01-05 Response to brief – Petitioner
2010-11-23 Post submission brief – Respondent
2010-09-14 Oral argument –
2010-09-14 Exhibits in case/cause filed – Petitioner
2010-09-10 Motion to Argue disposed – To identify a cause in View Sheet
2010-09-03 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Amicus Curiae
2010-09-03 Motion to Argue filed – Received (instead of filed)
2010-09-02 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Amicus Curiae
2010-08-11 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2010-07-26 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2010-07-16 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2010-07-13 File instrument. – Petitioner
2010-07-01 Address Change – Petitioner
2010-06-03 Description of document returned to Supreme Court – Amicus Curiae
2010-05-28 Petition for Review granted –
2010-05-28 Petition for Review disposed – OA date & time not set. View Sheet
2009-09-11 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-08-28 Reply brief. – Petitioner
2009-08-11 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-08-07 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-07-29 Brief filed. – Respondent
2009-06-22 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2009-06-19 Designation of Lead Counsel for (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2009-06-19 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2009-06-11 Correction of brief filed. See Remarks & Descrip – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-06-10 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2009-05-01 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-04-30 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-04-22 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2009-04-15 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Amicus Curiae
2009-04-15 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2009-04-15 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2009-04-15 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2009-04-14 Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2009-04-10 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-04-09 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-03-23 reply filed – Petitioner
2009-03-20 Phone call from Clerk's Office. –
2009-03-18 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2009-03-17 motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2009-03-13 M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2009-02-11 motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2009-02-11 M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2009-01-13 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-12-16 Case forwarded to Court –
2008-11-10 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2008-11-10 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2008-10-17 File instrument. – Petitioner
2008-10-06 m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-10-03 m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner