DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
CARROLL G. ROBINSON, BRUCE R. HOTZE, AND JEFFREY N. DAILY
v.
ANNISE D. PARKER, MAYOR; CITY OF HOUSTON; HOUSTON CITY COUNCIL, ET AL.
Closed

Articles Mentioning This Case

On the docket: Suing to enforce a city referendum; med mal experts; jurisdiction over corporate officers SCOTXblog (November 18, 2009)
Order List for June 26, 2009 SCOTXblog (June 26, 2009)
Opinions Issued

Green Jefferson Hecht Wainwright Medina Johnson Willett Lehrmann Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry 3 months ago
Docket Sheet
2011-10-31 Case stored in record room –
2011-10-31 Mandate issued –
2011-10-21 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed – To identify a cause in View Sheet
2011-09-20 Response to Motion for Rehearing – Respondent
2011-09-14 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates motion for rehearing. See Event
2011-09-12 Motion for Rehearing - Filed – Petitioner's motion for rehearing of cause filed
2011-08-26 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2011-08-26 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2011-05-03 Notice of Appearance – Respondent
2011-05-02 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2010-03-12 Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner
2010-03-11 Post submission brief – Petitioner
2009-12-03 Post submission brief – Respondent
2009-11-18 Oral argument –
2009-11-17 Amicus Curiae Brief received –
2009-10-26 Address Change – Respondent
2009-08-19 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2009-07-29 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2009-07-10 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-06-26 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of – OA date & time not set. View Sheet
2009-06-26 pet/rev granted –
2009-04-07 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2009-04-01 Brief filed. – Respondent
2009-02-24 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2009-02-23 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2009-02-09 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2009-01-20 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2009-01-12 Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2009-01-09 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-11-26 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2008-10-14 motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2008-10-10 M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2008-09-26 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; due no later than 3:00 p.m.; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-08-26 Case forwarded to Court –
2008-08-25 Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2008-08-22 Supplemental appendix – Petitioner
2008-08-20 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Petitioner
2008-08-18 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2008-08-18 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner