2011-12-08	Case stored in record room –
2011-12-02	Mandate issued –
2011-10-21	Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2011-10-21	Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2011-10-21	Petition for Review granted under TRAP 59.1 –
2011-10-21	Petition for Review disposed – View Sheet
2009-02-04	Brief filed. – Received (instead of filed)
2009-02-02	Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-01-20	Waiver notice for brief on the merits – Petitioner
2009-01-05	Waiver notice for brief on the merits – Respondent
2008-12-15	Brief filed. – Petitioner
2008-12-02	Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2008-11-14	Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2008-11-14	briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-11-14	Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2008-10-28	reply filed – Petitioner
2008-10-13	response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2008-09-25	Amicus Curiae Letter Received – Received (instead of filed)
2008-09-12	Amicus Curiae Brief received and placed w/record – Received (instead of filed)
2008-09-11	Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; due no later than 3:00 p.m.; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-08-25	Document received (See Remarks) – View Sheet
2008-08-25	Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Amicus Curiae
2008-08-12	Case forwarded to Court –
2008-08-07	Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2008-07-28	Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2008-07-28	PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner

Rolling Plains Groudwater Conservation District, petitioner see attorneys

City of Aspermont, Texas, respondent see attorneys

Harris-Galveston Subsidence District, amicus curiae see attorneys

Lone Star Groundwater Conservation District, amicus curiae see attorneys

Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts, amicus curiae see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney