DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
In re
SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Closed
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry 7 months ago
Docket Sheet
2011-07-13 Case stored in record room –
2009-12-11 Petition for Writ of Mandamus disposed – View Sheet
2009-12-11 Motion to dismiss disposed – View Sheet
2009-11-10 File instrument. – Real Parties in Interest
2009-10-30 Motion to lift stay order issued by SCt is dispose – View Sheet
2009-10-30 Stay Order Lifted –
2009-10-27 Response to Motion – Relator
2009-10-12 Motion to lift stay filed – Real parties in interest
2009-10-08 Oral argument –
2009-10-08 Oral argument - –
2009-09-25 File instrument. – Real parties in interest
2009-09-22 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Relator
2009-09-11 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Relator
2009-09-01 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Real parties in interest
2009-08-24 Address Change – Relator
2009-08-04 Reply to motion – Real parties in interest
2009-08-03 Response to Motion – Relator
2009-07-17 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply –
2009-07-16 Motion to dismiss filed – Real parties in interest
2009-07-10 Case set for oral argument – Event and/or disposition refers to mandamus
2009-04-10 Reply brief. – Relator
2009-03-27 petition for writ of mandamus acted upon –
2009-03-27 Mandamus Set to Argue –
2009-01-14 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2008-12-22 motion for extension of time (remarks) – View Sheet
2008-12-19 call from atty in case – Real parties in interest
2008-12-19 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Real parties in interest
2008-12-19 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Relator
2008-12-12 Brief filed. – Real parties in interest
2008-11-20 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Real parties in interest View Sheet
2008-11-20 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Relator View Sheet
2008-11-18 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Real parties in interest
2008-11-17 Brief filed. – Relator
2008-11-13 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Relator
2008-10-14 briefing on the merits requested – Event and/or disposition refers to mandamus
2008-08-29 motion to stay acted on –
2008-08-29 motion to strike disposed of – View Sheet
2008-08-29 Stay order issued. – Event and/or disposition refers to mandamus
2008-08-28 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Relator
2008-08-28 call from atty in case – Relator
2008-08-15 Response to Motion – Real parties in interest
2008-08-15 response to petition for writ of mandamus – Real parties in interest
2008-08-14 Motion to Strike – Relator
2008-08-12 Response to Motion – Real parties in interest
2008-08-12 motion to stay filed – Relator
2008-07-18 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; due no later than 3:00 p.m.; mailbox rule does not apply – Event and/or disposition refers to mandamus
2008-07-15 Case forwarded to Court –
2008-07-14 Designation of Lead Counsel for (remarks) – Real parties in interest View Sheet
2008-07-14 additional copies received – Relator
2008-07-09 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Relator
2008-07-09 Case Record Filed – Relator
2008-07-09 Appendix to Brief filed – Relator
2008-07-09 petition for writ of mandamus filed – Relator
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
Scoggins Construction Company, Inc., relator see attorneys

Mercedes Independent School District, real party in interest see attorneys

Texas Building Branch of the Associated General Contractors of America, amicus curiae see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney
Court of Appeals Opinions

DENIED June 30, 2008
Courts Below
Court of Appeals:
Corpus Christi (13th COA)
No. 13-08-00317-CV docket
Per Curiam

Trial Court:
Hidalgo County
Honorable Aida Salinas Flores