DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS
v.
THE ESTATE OF IRENE ESTHER ARANCIBIA BY ITS BENEFICIARY VICTOR HUGO VASQUEZ-ARANCIBIA, VICTOR HUGO VASQUEZ-ARANCIBIA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND CECILIA VASQUEZ-ARANCIBIA, INDIVIDUALLY
Closed
Opinions Issued

Jefferson Hecht Medina Green Willett Guzman Lehrmann Chief Justice Jefferson delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Hecht, Justice Medina, Justice Green, Justice Willett, Justice Guzman, and Justice Lehrmann joined. (PDF)
Johnson Wainwright Justice Johnson delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Wainwright joined. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry about 1 year ago
Docket Sheet
2011-01-27 Case stored in record room –
2010-12-03 Corrected Cost Bill sent –
2010-12-03 Mandate issued –
2010-10-22 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2010-10-22 Dissenting opinion issued. –
2010-10-22 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2009-09-10 Oral argument - –
2009-09-10 Oral argument - –
2009-08-04 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2009-07-29 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2009-07-10 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-06-26 previous order of court withdrawn –
2009-06-26 pet/rev granted –
2009-06-26 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of – OA date & time not set. View Sheet
2009-06-26 Petition reinstated to the docket –
2009-06-26 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed – View Sheet
2009-05-15 Amicus Curiae Letter Received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-05-14 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2009-05-12 Case forwarded to Court –
2009-05-07 Motion for Rehearing - Filed – rehearing filed - petition for review
2009-05-05 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Petitioner
2009-05-05 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-05-04 Call received – Respondent
2009-05-04 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Respondent
2009-05-04 m/e/t to file motion for rehearing – Petitioner
2009-04-17 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of – Indicates filing re Petition for Review View Sheet
2009-03-18 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner's reply brief View Sheet
2009-03-10 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2009-03-10 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Petitioner
2009-03-10 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-02-25 Notice of vacation dates. –
2009-02-20 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner's reply brief View Sheet
2009-02-20 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-02-05 Brief filed. – Respondent
2009-01-08 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2009-01-06 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2008-12-31 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2008-12-18 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-12-18 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2008-12-18 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2008-11-26 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-11-25 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2008-10-31 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-10-24 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2008-09-26 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-09-25 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2008-09-25 Designation of Lead Counsel for (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-08-29 Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2008-08-28 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-07-22 reply filed – Petitioner
2008-07-07 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2008-06-05 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; due no later than 3:00 p.m.; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-05-23 Additional citations received. – Petitioner
2008-05-06 Case forwarded to Court –
2008-04-04 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2008-04-04 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2008-03-20 m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-03-19 m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, petitioner see attorneys

The Estate of Irene Esther Arancibia, respondent see attorneys

Dallas County, Texas, amicus curiae see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney