2009-09-21	Case stored in record room –
2009-07-31	Mandate Issued –
2009-06-19	Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2009-06-19	Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2008-02-13	Amicus Curiae Brief received and placed w/record – Received (instead of filed)
2008-02-05	Oral argument - –
2007-12-21	Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2007-12-17	Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2007-11-30	Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of – View Sheet
2007-11-30	Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2007-11-30	pet/rev granted –
2007-10-30	Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2007-10-30	Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2007-10-30	Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2007-10-26	Reply brief. – Petitioner
2007-10-04	Brief filed. – Respondent
2007-09-06	motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2007-08-31	Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2007-08-10	Brief filed. – Petitioner
2007-07-12	motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2007-07-03	Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2007-06-28	Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2007-06-25	Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2007-06-25	Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Amicus Curiae
2007-06-25	Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2007-06-14	Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2007-06-12	briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2007-05-18	Amicus Curiae Brief received and placed w/record – Received (instead of filed)
2007-05-09	reply filed – Petitioner
2007-05-04	MET to file reply disposed of – View Sheet
2007-04-25	Motion to extend time to file reply – Petitioner
2007-04-10	response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2007-03-28	motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2007-03-23	M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2007-02-23	motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2007-02-15	M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2007-01-26	response to requested; due ____; see remarks – Indicates filing re Petition for Review View Sheet
2007-01-03	Case forwarded to Court –
2006-11-29	Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2006-11-29	PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2006-10-17	m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2006-10-12	m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner

Nabors Drilling USA, Inc., petitioner see attorneys

Escoto, Francisca, respondent see attorneys

Estate of Jose Gutierrez, respondent see attorneys

Estate of Roberto Escoto, respondent see attorneys

Rodriguez, Dora, respondent see attorneys

Estate of Martin Rodriguez, respondent see attorneys

Rodriguez, Uvaldo, respondent see attorneys

Rodriguez, Isabel, respondent see attorneys

Rodriguez, Patricia, respondent see attorneys

Rodriguez, Elizabeth, respondent see attorneys

Torres, Noelia, respondent see attorneys

Estate of Leovarda Torres, respondent see attorneys

Torres, Yazmin, respondent see attorneys

The Oilfield Companies, amicus curiae see attorneys

Pacific Legal Foundation, amicus curiae
      appears in 3 other active cases see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney