DocketDB

Data Feeds and Other Resources
for the Public

We open some of our tools to the public.

Recent Opinions and Vote Breakdowns New Requests for Full Merits Briefing New Petitions Filed With the Court Cases Broken Down by Court of Appeals Community-Driven List of Pending Issues Top Amicus Curiae Groups and Cases Cases Mentioned in News Stories and Blogs
SOLAR APPLICATIONS ENGINEERING, INC.
v.
T.A. OPERATING CORPORATION
Closed
Opinions Issued

Wainwright Jefferson Hecht Medina Johnson Willett Guzman Lehrmann Justice Wainwright delivered the opinion of the Court. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry 8 months ago
Docket Sheet
2011-06-09 Case stored in record room –
2011-01-14 Mandate issued –
2010-12-03 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –
2010-12-03 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2010-07-19 Address Change – Respondent
2007-10-16 Oral argument - –
2007-10-16 Exhibits in case/cause filed – Petitioner
2007-10-15 Additional citations received. – Respondent
2007-10-12 Phone call from Clerk's Office. –
2007-07-20 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2007-04-27 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of – View Sheet
2007-04-27 Case set for oral argument – OA date & time not set.
2007-04-27 pet/rev granted –
2007-03-02 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2007-02-12 Reply brief. – Petitioner
2007-02-05 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2007-01-26 Brief filed. – Respondent
2006-12-27 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2006-12-13 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2006-12-06 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-12-06 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-12-06 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-12-04 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2006-11-17 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2006-11-14 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2006-11-13 Record Requested in Petition for Review –
2006-11-03 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2006-09-12 reply filed – Petitioner
2006-08-30 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2006-07-14 motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2006-07-14 M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2006-06-29 response to requested; due ____; see remarks – Indicates filing re Petition for Review View Sheet
2006-05-30 Case forwarded to Court –
2006-05-24 Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2006-05-01 Amicus Curiae Brief received and placed w/record – Received (instead of filed)
2006-04-26 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2006-04-26 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2006-03-29 m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2006-03-27 m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
Solar Applications Engineering, Inc., petitioner see attorneys

T.A. Operating Corporation, respondent see attorneys

American Subcontractors Association, Inc., amicus curiae see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney